Animals and Environment

Index:

AWA: Bison Designation in Alberta (here)

We're Running Out the Clock on Caribou Population (here)

Letter to Government of Alberta for COP15 on Biodiversity (here)

The Environmental Impact of Meat (here)

Thinking With Animals (here)

The Vital Role of Insects (here)

(Back to Index)

AWA: Bison Designation in Alberta
15 March 2023

Dear Minister Schulz and Minister Wilson,

We are writing to request your support for the reclassification of free-ranging bison as ‘wildlife’ under the Alberta Wildlife Act. This important change would recognize their vital role in the ecosystem, provide protection for wandering herds, and acknowledge the cultural and historic significance for Indigenous communities. Reclassification would also align Alberta with the neighbouring provinces of Saskatchewan and British Columbia, where bison are already recognized as wildlife.

American bison (Bison bison), also known as buffalo, iinnii (in Blackfoot) or Tatâga (in Stoney Nakoda), are a keystone species, critical to the health and long-term sustainability of ecosystems, particularly in the prairie region. Their movement, grazing, wallowing and other behaviours support the creation of distinct habitats, promoting plant and animal biodiversity and encouraging ecosystem resiliency. Unlike cattle, which are domesticated and an introduced species, bison evolved as a part of the grasslands and open woodlands of the boreal forest. The current classification of plains bison and wood bison outside designated Wildlife Management Units (WMUs) as domesticated livestock fails to recognize their integral role within the ecosystem.

[...]

Designating plains and wood bison as ‘wildlife’ under the Alberta Wildlife Act is long overdue, and is vital for effective management, conservation and recognition of bison on the Alberta landscape. As Minister of Environment and Protected Areas and Minister of Indigenous Affairs, your respective ministries have the responsibility to protect Alberta’s biodiversity and ecosystem health, and work towards meaningful reconciliation with Indigenous communities. Bison, as both a keystone species and strong cultural symbol, are crucial to maintaining ecological health and supporting Indigenous healing.

For the complete letter, click ... here.

(Back to Index)

We're Running Out the Clock on Caribou Population
Lorne Fitch, P.Biol.
Published in The Lethbridge Herald 16 February 2024

Great billows of smoke were used to hide battleships in wartime. Smokescreens are still employed, but to disguise a lack of meaningful activity, especially with the long-running battle to save caribou in Alberta. You can’t see the smoke, but it’s there in the form of caribou task forces, ostensibly tasked with saving caribou, but having the opposite intent.

The federal government, the last chance for species at risk, has told the province to produce and deliver on a plan to ensure caribou don’t go the way of the passenger pigeon. A recently released report, years late, shows little or no progress.

Caribou task forces were formed of concerned conservation groups and Indigenous Peoples plus the usual footdraggers of industry. In particular, the timber and energy industries are the ultimate gate-keepers, trying to run out the clock for caribou, as they maximize economic opportunity. They are abetted by timorous provincial politicians, who hide in plain sight, behind the smokescreen of these committees.

Caribou are running out of time. Or, time is running out of caribou. This species depends on mature to old growth forests. This is where lichens, the caribou’s main food source, are found. Mature forests don’t provide forage for moose and deer—the mainstay for wolves. When timber is harvested habitat shifts to benefit moose and deer and the logging roads, seismic lines, oilpatch roads and pipeline right of ways are perfect travel lanes for wolves. Caribou lose.

The pace of resource extraction in the northern foothills and boreal forest is at a stage where no caribou population seems safe and most are declining.

Biologists hold little hope if the present trend continues. In the face of this, industry denies, delays, detracts and deflects from any reasonable solution that would keep caribou on the land.

The timber industry says, “Don’t worry, in 80 to 100 years there will be lots of caribou habitat.” This would be like assuring those in the conference room that oxygen isn’t available right now, but will be in a day or two. Perhaps it was a lack of oxygen that prompted the industry response. An energy representative replied that the pace of oil and gas extraction had to continue or else, “Where would the government get the financial resources for caribou habitat restoration?” These are not solutions, but rather hollow and disingenuous excuses.

In the sitcom, The Simpsons, Ned’s parents were beatniks, early precursors to hippies. In the care, raising and nurturing of Ned, they rejected the conventional norms and disciplines of parental authority and direction.

Ned developed symptoms of bad behaviour, beyond their control. In desperation they took him to a child psychologist. The doctor asked what they had tried to change Ned’s behaviour. Ned’s father, frustrated and desperate for help said, “We’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas.”

This Simpson’s episode is a perfect metaphor for the lack of progress on caribou conservation.

This smokescreen doesn’t cover caribou, because there are so few left to disguise.

Politicians and the senior bureaucrats have forgotten who their “tribe” is—it is Albertans and not industry. That misplaced loyalty got us to where we are today with caribou. Utah Philips, folk singer, raconteur and anarchist, once said: “The Earth is not dying, it is being killed, and those who are doing the killing have names and addresses.” Their names and affiliations are writ large on the phoney caribou task forces and, in the background, those who set up these smokescreens to disguise their spineless behaviour.

Doing nothing is not a course of action. Instead, it is a flight from responsibility and accountability. It may be high time for the federal government to step in, to be the adults in the room.

The province and its industry allies seem intent on running out the clock on caribou to ensure no appropriate recovery action is taken. Shame on them.

Lorne Fitch is a professional biologist, a retired provincial Fish and Wildlife Biologist and a former Adjunct Professor with the University of Calgary.

(Back to Index)

December 2, 2022

To: Hon. Sonya Savage, Minister of Environment and Protected Areas

RE: COP15 - Conference on Biological Diversity

Biodiversity is both vital to, and an indicator of, a healthy natural environment (an intrinsic value) and the ecosystem services it provides (a human value). The Convention on Biological Diversity, ratified by Canada in 1992, “aims to conserve nature, ensure nature is used sustainably and that the benefits to people from the use of genetic diversity are shared fairly.” The tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP-10) adopted a Strategic Plan for Biodiversity, including the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, for the 2011-2020 period. This plan provides an overarching framework for biodiversity in the context of the 2050 Vision, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The upcoming Conference on Biological Diversity (COP15) will provide an opportunity for global leaders to establish goals and make commitments to address biodiversity loss, from threats of local extirpation to global extinction.

Habitat loss and degradation is the primary threat to biodiversity, in Canada and globally. The United Nations recognizes biodiversity loss as one of the world’s most pressing emergencies, along with pollution and climate change (which contribute to threats to biodiversity). In 2021, the United Nations Environment Programme stated the following in its Making Peace with Nature report:

Species are currently going extinct tens to hundreds of times faster than the natural background rate. One million of the world’s estimated 8 million species of plants and animals are threatened with extinction. The population sizes of wild vertebrates have dropped by an average of 68 per cent in the last 50 years, and the abundance of many wild insect species has fallen by more than half. … Ecosystems are degrading at an unprecedented rate, driven by land-use change, exploitation, climate change, pollution and invasive alien species. Climate change exacerbates other threats to biodiversity, and many plant and animal species have already experienced changes in their range, abundance and seasonal activity. Degradation of ecosystems is impacting their functions and harming their ability to support human well-being. Loss of biodiversity is anticipated to accelerate in coming decades, unless actions to halt and reverse human transformation and degradation of ecosystems and to limit climate change are urgently implemented.

Canada has established national targets to protect 17% of terrestrial and 10% of marine areas to align with the international target. Alberta co-chaired the Pathway to Canada Target 1 process and promised 17% of lands in Alberta would be protected by 2020 (to date, only 15% has been protected).

In the upcoming COP15, Alberta needs to expand commitments towards protecting biodiversity. This means increasing targets to 25% of land protected by 2025, particularly in grassland, parkland and foothills ecosystems where adequate protection is currently lacking. Maintaining natural corridors (for animal migration and to allow whole biomes to adapt to climate change) will require a concentrated effort in reducing the conversion and fragmentation of native prairie and forest habitat.

In this effort, expanding protection of the Twin River Heritage Rangeland Natural Area, approved in the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan, would be one immediate action towards increasing protection in the grasslands. Another current issue involves the expansion of irrigation in southern Alberta, which may lead to the further conversion of native grasslands and increase pressures on already-stressed rivers and riparian ecosystems. The process of irrigation expansion lacks a cumulative effects analysis which would require robust modelling of water availability and water quality as evaluated on the basis of the whole water basin, from the tributaries to Saskatchewan. In addition, this evaluation should consider Treaty obligations with First Nations and international agreements for allocations to Montana, as well as water challenges anticipated by the advancing threat of climate change.  Biodiversity loss from expanding irrigated acres and from reducing water flows in tributaries that already do not meet instream flow needs are conceivable threats that must be considered in provincial efforts to protect biodiversity.

Planning may best be augmented by completing effective regional and sub-regional land-use policies, with cumulative effects assessments and science-based limits on development. Conservation measures to protect species-at-risk should be expanded, and a clear measure for ‘protected and conserved areas’ reintroduced back into the Government of Alberta Business Plan Standards. Urgent action is vital to halting and reversing biodiversity loss.

The Southern Alberta Group for the Environment encourages the Province of Alberta to be a leader in the protection of biodiversity, which is the very foundation of environmental, social and economic health in the province.

 

For more information:

https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/oth_202210_e_44128.html

https://www.biodivcanada.ca/national-biodiversity-strategy-and-action-plan/2020-biodiversity-goals-and-targets-for-canada

(Back to Index)

The Environmental Impact of Meat

Have you ever eaten a ‘Beyond Meat’ burger? Is it better for the environment than the meat it replaces?

Livestock production for meat consumption is a huge topic, and the best choice for the environment depends a lot on the context: where the livestock was raised, how it was raised, and what it was fed.

Livestock that is naturally grass-fed and raised in free-range conditions appropriate for the land use (like grazing lands in Alberta that previously sustained bison) provides meat with a low environmental impact. [1]  Unfortunately, we know that most animals for meat production are not raised under these conditions. We also know that as the standard of living for much of the world’s population rises, so does the consumption of meat.

Sustainability is the organizing principle for meeting human development goals while simultaneously maintaining the ability of natural systems to provide the natural resources and ecosystem services upon which the economy and society depend. The global increase in meat consumption is not sustainable. Part of the problem is the social and environmental impacts of industrial scale agriculture; part of the problem is the inefficient conversion of plant crops to meat; and part of the problem is the environmental impact of intensive livestock operations.

Much of our meat is raised on soybeans, corn, and barley as feed. The global increase in meat consumption has been accompanied by large increases in grain and soybean production for intensive livestock operations. One-third of the world’s arable land grows industrial-scale crop monocultures dedicated to feed animals raised intensively for meat consumption. The conversion of rainforests and natural grasslands and the application of fertilizer and pesticides for animal feed is not environmentally friendly – it releases massive quantities of sequestered carbon to the atmosphere and it is wasteful of land, energy, water and clean air. [2] [3]

Meat consumption is mainly driven by culture, tradition and taste. The intermediate step of feeding plant crops to animals intended for human consumption is unnecessary and wasteful. Crops grown for meat production should instead be used to feed humans directly.

Based on calories, 6 units of feed will convert to 1 unit of pork, and 12 units of feed will convert to 1 unit of beef. For poultry, the conversion is 2:1 which makes it a lower-impact source of protein, in general. [4]

On August 8, 2019, over a hundred leading researchers released a summary report on climate change and land through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The report describes plant-based diets as a major opportunity for mitigating and adapting to climate change, and includes policy recommendations to reduce meat consumption. The report states with high confidence that balanced diets featuring plant-based and sustainably produced sources of meat “present major opportunities for adaptation and mitigation while generating significant co-benefits in terms of human health.”

In the last decade, plant-based foods have been developed to create alternatives for those accustomed to the taste of meat. A ‘Beyond Meat’ burger has 18 ingredients, including: pea protein isolate, canola and coconut oil, rice protein, cocoa butter, mung bean protein, pomegranate fruit powder, and beet juice extract (to give the burger its meat-like ‘blood’).

Is this an environmentally friendly substitute for meat? Can we make better choices with our meat consumption?

1.  An Environmentalist’s Case for Beef 
     Kevin Van Tighem, Alberta Views.
     1 July 2020

2.  Chart Shows What the World’s Land Is Used For
     Natasha Brooks, One Green Planet
     Accessed 31 July 2020

3.  How much of the world's cropland is actually used to grow food?
     Brad Plumer, VOX
     16 Dec 2014

4.  Feed to Meat; Conversion Inefficiency Ratios
     A Well Fed World; Plant Based Hunger Solutions

Other Sources of Interest.

5.  What’s the beef with red meat?
    Harvard Men's Health Watch
    February 2020 
  

(Back to Index)

Thinking With Animals

In thoughtful times, what Canadian doesn’t turn to Leonard Cohen?  Consider one of his most famous songs. Suzanne, the lyrics go, takes you down to her place by the river and ‘feeds you tea and oranges that come all the way from China’.

Oolala, Leonard - all the way from China?  But this was written in 1966  when China might reasonably be seen as far away, both in imagination and geography.  Now goods cross international borders, span what we once thought of as vast oceans, fly the (pre-pandemic) crowded skies and arrive in our stores at a fraction of the price of mandarin oranges in Cohen’s era.

But at what cost?  What does it cost us to curtail production here and take advantage of cheaper labour costs in other lands, to fly fresh produce around the world, to truck pigs, cattle and poultry across borders as though they were no more sentient than crates of oranges?

If the world seems close and perhaps claustrophobic to us now, we are left to imagine how the walls of civilization are closing in on the biosphere of other life forms with whom we share this blue and green planet.  Other species who once had the luxury of space separate from human inquiry & exploitation.

Charismatic fauna like tigers, elephants and mountain goats have long felt the impact of human encroachment both territorially and as objects of cultural significance.  Animals that are hunted not for meat but for what it means to have their hides or heads adorning our spaces.  Others, like the pangolin are less famously centred in our awareness but are of increasing importance as the most heavily trafficked wild mammal across the world today.

Famously studied by Mary Douglas working with the Lele of Central Africa (circa 1964) pangolins are described as a scaly anteater with the body and tail of a fish yet with four legs used to climb in trees.[1]  Pangolins (Manis tricuspis) do not fear people and reproduce like us, usually having only one live child at a time. These anomalies suggested to the Lele a special link between humans and animals – a creature that could spiritually mediate between the two.  Killing a pangolin, they said, brings animals to hunters and babies to women - both of which were highly desired.

For all the curiosity of pangolins, neither their threatened status nor their presumed medicinal qualities are unique - many animals perform a similar role as anomalous creatures believed to bridge the worlds of spiritual and secular. Many believe we can incorporate the special qualities of an animal in a number of ways but most usually by hunting and eating.  All the science in the world can prove otherwise, that pangolin meat has no liver enhancing qualities, for example – yet humans persist in making the animal a way to think about or gain favour for ourselves within the cosmosphere.

Origins of the current pandemic are not settled, but certainly viral diseases have long leaped from animals to human.  Spanish flu was an HIN1 virus from presumed avian source, AIDS resided in primates and seems to have jumped to humans via consuming monkeys or apes. Our modest pangolin may have been an intermediate host for bat to human transmission of Coronavirus. In fact 60% of infectious diseases that affect us are zoonotic, having originated in animals. More than two-thirds of those originate in wildlife.[2]

Many of us are anxious to get back to normal after the lockdown lifts but what version of  ‘normal’?  Can we develop a more harmonious relationship with the natural world?  Admire animals not for the way they help us think about us – but for what they intrinsically are?  Can we set aside tracts of land for them, lands like Yellowstone to Yukon (Y2Y) where we tread lightly, sacrificing some of our freedom for their very survivability?  Can we begin to think of our relationships on earth not only in terms of sustainability but  'abundability' as Nuu-chah-nulth knowledge carrier Joe Martin relates. [3]

Cohen has passed on to whatever lies beyond, but his songs remain for us to ponder and enjoy.  Like animals in traditional Lele cosmology, his music is good to think with.  Like animals worldwide, life is not only analogies and poetry, but the reality of a warm beating heart – good to think and good to respect.

1. Douglas, Mary
              Implicit Meanings
              2003 Routledge (original 1975)

2. Robbins, Jim
              The Ecology of Disease
              14 July 14 2012

New York Times Article Link.

3.  Gilpin, Emillee
              COVID-19 not the first pandemic Indigenous Peoples have quarantined from
              2 April 2020

National Observor Link.  

Further Information:

Coronavirus: China’s farmers offered buy-out to grow plants instead of breeding wild species in clampdown.

COVID-19, Brought to You by Globalization.

Don't blame the bats for the Coronavirus | Dr. Jane Goodall | SVT/TV 2/Skavlan.

'Tip of the iceberg': is our destruction of nature responsible for Covid-19?

Zoonotic transfer study fuels call for ban of wildlife trade, markets and medicinal use.

(Back to Index)


The Vital Role of Insects

I have a weakness for the little things of this planet. Insects, in all their variety, ability, and beauty. I especially love spiders. In fact, last summer my family adopted a gorgeous Cat Face Spider who had spread her web across my son’s window. We caught lunch for her - it was fabulous to watch her zip down from her hidey-hole to wrap up her prey in thick white silk. Her wrapping web was nearly invisible, like thin wool. Spiders produce seven types of silk for different jobs.


  

Wiki, Araneus gemmoides (Cat Faced Spider)

 

To me, that’s fascinating and miraculous.

My love of insects gives me joy, but it also makes me vulnerable.
I guess love always carries the possibility of loss.
But people who love critters haven’t had to face the possibility of insects being in serious peril before.

Now we do. As Damian Carrington wrote in The Guardian:

The world’s insects are hurtling down the path to extinction, threatening a “catastrophic collapse of nature’s ecosystems”, according to the first global scientific review.

More than 40% of insect species are declining and a third are endangered, the analysis found. The rate of extinction is eight times faster than that of mammals, birds and reptiles. The total mass of insects is falling by a precipitous 2.5% a year, according to the best data available, suggesting they could vanish within a century.

Oh! But maybe the insects in Canada are okay …

No. They’re not. But we knew that, didn’t we? All you have to do is remember the plethora of insects plastered across your windshield after a long summer trip. That doesn’t happen anymore. The insects are just not there.

Agriculture Canada scientist Jeff Skevington, who works with the Canadian National Collection of Insects:

... the country has lost a significant amount of its insect biodiversity in recent years based on the results of annual collection samples.
That means a lot of the insects at the bottom of our food chain are dying out, which could have an unexpected, but noticeable impact on the lives of humans.

In our region, 720 species of insects are at risk, and there’s an estimated 30,000 prairie species that haven’t even been studied yet. In other words, insect species could disappear before we even got a chance to find out they existed! [i] 

Insects are critical to the health of people. They pollinate our food, anchor entire food chains, break down plants and other organic matter, and control pest species that can decimate crops. Insects are such an important part of our planet’s ecosystems that biologist E.O. Wilson once called them 'The little things that run the world.'

Why are insects threatened? There are multiple factors, including pesticide and herbicide use, habitat loss, intensive agriculture, light pollution (turning insects into easy prey at night), and climate change. Skevington says climate change is "one of the most impactful reason bugs are dying out." He cited recent temperature fluctuations in spring that some bugs simply can’t endure.  "Quite often you’ll have really big warm spells so you get a flush of insects coming out, followed by a cold snap" he said. Cold snaps can interrupt a bug’s lifecycle and severely impact their populations, and heat waves affect insect reproduction by severely decreasing male fertility. [ii]

What can we do to help insects bounce back? A lot! We can: stop using chemicals on our lawn and garden, get rid of the bug zapper (which kills good insects, not mosquitoes), and buy organic food and cotton products that use fewer pesticides in production. In your garden, plant native species and leave little homes insects can shelter in, especially over the winter. [iii]

We’ll all be better off if insects can thrive again.
You don’t have to feed a spider, but you can give one a hidey-hole in your yard!

[i] Insects at Risk in the Prairie Region
Peter W. Hall, Paul M. Catling, J. Donald Lafontaine.  PDF
www.biology.ualberta.ca/bsc/english/grasslandbook2/Chapter13_ACGv2.pdf

[ii]  Experimental heatwaves compromise sperm function and cause transgenerational damage in a model insect
Sales, K., Vasudeva, R., Dickinson, M.E. et al.
Nat Commun 9, 4771 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07273-z

[iii]  Endangered Species International

General Interest:

Insect population faces 'catastrophic' collapse: Sydney research
12 February 2019
Review shows 40 percent of species threatened with extinction
The University of Sydney